This is more a rant than the rest, and a bit removed from the discussion of hiking, and hiking clothes for women. Sure I'd love to start a clothes company of my own which might even have it’s own “social mission” so to talk. Clothing companies aims are getting cash by concentrating on girls. In the process nearly all of clothing corporations make the world worse for girls. It's as if it is an agenda in opposition to girls. Most likely most women’s types are designed and conceptualized by men from the drawing board to the final sewing collectively of the apparel merchandise. The few girls who are within the women’s clothes design trade apparently are doing little or nothing to instigate a development toward higher clothes designs for women who want practicality, dignity and perform of their clothes. And that is the place the dilemma is available in for a lot of ladies who don’t care about “Looking younger” or “Being girly.” Ladies who just want useful, comfortable clothes are really underrepresented . Positive, lots of people would say “Not so. Since numerous low-rise or skin-tight denims, and cleavage-revealing shirts and crotch-length shorts, and tastelessly-brief skirts are the sort of clothes that probably the vast majority of girls purchase (judging by the prominence and availability of such clothes) , then it means these are the types that may proceed to be manufactured and furthermore these kinds of “feminine styles” will make their approach into all types of women’s clothes, even those that are imagined to be for operate not fashion. ” So their women’s shirts are designed with “princess seams” and curve-enhancing stitches and so on. It isn't the only clothing firm that makes “active-women’s wear” that incorporates trend into function. It brings us again to where we started. As fairly a few women who posted here on “Hiking Lady” have mentioned, they resort to men’s clothes for higher match, higher comfort, higher freedom of movement and better durability. I'd say that usually unisex sizing is the perfect strategy to go along with some features that might help accommodate individuals who might need a bit more hip or belly (each men and women). Nearly all of women’s “active wear” simply don’t have it. ’s clothing. Men’s sizes are bigger even relating to “small” sizes for males. I doubt this is not possible. Basically, ladies can match into men’s clothes this way. The scrubs had been supplied by the facility. I recently was working in a analysis facility and was required to wear scrubs. I told her that in the case of scrubs, a dimension small pant doesn't fit me and it is strange because most small-dimension men’s pants fit me. The availability particular person mentioned she thought a size small would match me. The availability individual stated that it is because girls have hips and males don’t. I advised her that it appears that evidently numerous small-sized men would find it onerous to fit in most small-sized scrubs too. What a lot of people appear to overlook is that some males do have pretty-distinguished hips and nearly all of men’s clothes are meant for males with perfectly straight hips. The truth is when males get older, of their 40s they very often develop larger hips. Years ago, I recall a radio business for a particular kind of Levis jeans which had been meant for older males and it was said that the features had extra room in the hip and thigh. But men have a better deal with regards to clothes. Women’s clothing is all the time made to incorporate fashion rather than function. EMS and REI and Sierra Buying and selling Submit, and Moosejaw, and Cabela’s and Sportsman’s Guide, and numerous different such stores, or on-line shops have a few of the better sorts of clothing meant for hiking and different outdoor activities. Manufacturers similar to Ex-Officio, Arctryx, The North Face, Sherpa, Marmot, Mammut, Mountain Hardwear, Columbia and numerous others. These brands are inclined to have the best possible materials, and the perfect features. They have one of the best mix of fabrics in order to be lightweight as potential for scorching days and which may protect in cold days without a whole lot of bulk. They are inclined to have SPF inbuilt to guard the wearer from the sun’s rays. I had to make use of a big size to have room for my shoulders and arms but then the a part of the jacket that was beneath the waist bellowed out and simply was uncomfortable to put on and simply had a really awkward look to it. Yet, I've seen such absurdly-lower jackets for girls by The North Face. It was “merely” meant to boost the feminine type whereas being “useful” for out of doors activity, or that's what the designers had in mind and yet I should surprise what they have been thinking by making a jacket like this. It felt tight and proscribing when i moved. I don’t know the way it ever got manufactured and doubtless thousands were made and it appeared to be a waste of time and supplies and it seemed as if the “quality control people” missed some main design flaws. I want I wrote down the style quantity in order that maybe I could discover a link to it in the web and possibly you all can see for your self. There are different women’s active put on that will not be as extreme however which still have enough lack of perform so that most energetic women simply can not use them. The Hole and Outdated Navy are usually not particularly for lively put on however they have small line of such clothes. I feel that they're awful in materials and design. The Hole, Previous Navy, Modell’s, Target, Okay-Mart and other such stores, essentially solely have clothes made from cotton ( with a couple of exceptions). Modell’s is alleged to be a “sports store” nevertheless it carries exercise clothes for ladies which is made by Nike, Addidas (and so forth) and although these are nicely-recognized brand names, I find that they really put too much style into clothing on the expense of function. They went out of business years ago however in addition they had clothing for women that I discovered to be impractically designed. In New York Metropolis where I reside there is one REI and two EMSs and one not-as-nicely-recognized retailer in decrease Manhattan which sells all kinds of outdoor/camping/hiking tools and clothing. There was once a retailer in NYC known as Herman’s and one other referred to as Robbin’s. Far from it. I have seen women in these stores talking to gross sales associates and saying that they have seemed everywhere for more sensible designs . There is an organization that lots of you probably have heard of referred to as “Title 9.” They strictly make women’s active put on. There are various Modell’s and one Sports Authority, and some Previous Navy’s and It would appear that there are a variety of stores that may have something for every woman. Guess what? It doesn’t work. The majority of their styles are meant to “enhance figures” and make the wearer “look feminine” while taking part in sports activities or partaking in rugged outside actions. Why do I all the time discover that the clothes that come the closest to being purposeful and rugged and practical are the ones which can be discontinued and replaced by those who aren’t? Their women’s bathing fits are really ineffective. They're meant for women who have perfect figures , even who are professional models and the bathing suits are sexist in my opinion. They might continue a sure model for a number of seasons or they might substitute the style and never revive it. Why should any bathing suit be “hi-cut” or like a thong and bra and legging sets the highest be meant to reveal cleavage? Title 9 has had certain sorts of designs referred to as “Grab and Go” meaning that the clothes are so virtually designed which you could just grab them, throw them on, and walk out the door to exercise or do anything. Are you going to go swimming or surfing , or are you going to work in a “gentleman’s club” ? I want that it was as marketed to be. All through my life I've gone from store to store during certain instances of the yr searching for the best rugged and functional clothes for winter or summer. It's at all times laborious to search out anything close to what I want. It typically goes for shoes and slippers and other footwear too. I typically have to take whatever comes closest and that's usually within the men’s part. There are designs which I will go to my grave scratching my head over relating to why they were made the way in which they have been.. I as soon as found some snug slip-ons made by Teva. But the absurd thing was that the soles have been designed with pretty-deep grooves that had been very closely spaced they usually have been throughout the only real . Just why aren’t sneakers and footwear made to be cleaned? They're the main piece of clothes that can be touching the ground and going via all sorts of disgusting stuff. I've had a fantasy of designing shoes that are meant to be cleaned and are straightforward to wash. I can’t for the life of me understand why such a design was made. To enable climbing on rocky or uneven surfaces, and yet it does not work on any form of foot put on like it works on a Jeep’s tires. I do know that hiking boot soles are made like a Jeep’s tires are made. Why hasn’t any clothes producer observed this? With footwear, small rocks and mud and leaves and branches (and many others) get stuck in the grooves of hiking boot soles. With a Jeep’s wheels, the constant and intense rolling of the tires implies that a number of the debris will likely be hurled off. No human can create that kind of bodily power to repeatedly drive the mud and pebbles and debris to be hurled out of the shoe’s soles. The best way that the grooves are designed it solely makes the soles exhausting to wash. It means that the grooves on the soles of hiking boots will be filled up with debris and wouldn't assist much in helping the wearer to successfully climb; that is if the grooves on the soles of hiking boots are literally meant to allow the wearer to climb. It seems to me that if the soles are product of rubber there isn’t a need for such elaborately designed grooves that solely acquire dirt. I'm wondering why there aren’t chemists and clothes technicians engaged on a better form of rubber that grips on all surfaces or grips higher on rocky surfaces or wherever hiking shoes are used, and it could make it unnecessary to make grooves on the soles of sneakers. I have seen some unusual designs that do not contribute to function. It seems to me that grooves are simply placed on the soles of shoes for fashion functions. This goes for sneakers too. Lots of sneakers which could be good in design in different ways, have very impractically designed soles. So far as sweatpants , scrub pants , and other such sorts of pants, there are those which have “elastic waist” or “comfort waist” and there are these with drawstrings. After all I am not an professional in making sneakers or shoe-soles and i may very well be wrong , however I am enough of an knowledgeable in wearing sneakers meant for energetic lifestyles and I feel that a lot of shoe manufacturers are focusing on the wrong thing. I wonder why any pant is designed with a drawstring when an elastic waist would make it pointless . Now-a-days a majority of drawstring-waist are made in order that the drawstring is stitched into the again of the pants waist area. I hate anything with a drawstring waist. I feel it makes the drawstring much less efficient and it defeats the purpose of the drawstring. Underwear: I have been in stores resembling K-Mart and Goal where there are a big variety of women’s underwear. It is hard to find the form of briefs that almost all of our grandmothers used to wear, not “hi-cuts,” not ” boy shorts,” not thongs. All are horrible for my part. I want consolation, sturdiness and straightforward-care. All that does not converse for me. Anything that gets stuck you-know-the place is unacceptable. I've been within the underwear part of malls and different shops (I have to admit I by no means appeared in Victoria’s Secret however I don’t count on to find anything sensible there), and I have seen older girls trying to find one thing that is age-applicable and dignified and , once more, sensible. There's little other than these hi-cuts. See one of the links beneath for an article in regards to the history of women’s underwear. Even “briefs” are usually not modest sufficient. It appears it has always been about bodily limiting girls. That’s the way I take a look at it. Additionally one of many hyperlinks under result in an article about how there shall be a women’s like of clothes which might be impressed by “Barbie.” Isn’t this 2014? It signifies that the elastic is sewn into the “hem” of the legs and waist. The closest I've discovered to what I desire is a certain Jockey brand brief “Elance.” It has “banded” legs and waist which is the better kind of design to get. Elastic that's merely sewn ONTO the waist and legs tends to be much less rugged and the stitching can come undone more easily . I must order a measurement bigger than I normally would in order that the waist wouldn't be too tight. One main flaw with “Elance” is that the waist is designed to be tight. And, I don’t perceive the real purpose of “athletic bras” the way they're designed. I certain don’t care about “standing out.” ( I actually don’t in any case, and that i don’t care). Bras meant for lively lifestyles should hold them in, nothing extra. I have heard of bras meant to “lift and separate.” I've seen some female runners who look like prime heavy and still they're very fast but I'm wondering if they'll develop again issues later in life. I know that I might not be addressing the needs of girls born with sure sizes, or who have special wants similar to after surgical procedure, however sport bras needs to be made to have sufficient comfy tension to stop bouncing. There may be a need for bras that do what some jock straps are alleged to do. I want to design shirts and vests with tension constructed into the suitable space that might make bras pointless. It could be wonderful for hotter weather and for simplicity, so that you don’t have to bother with attaching a bra after which a shirt. Simply keep “them” from moving. Just slip into your shirt (and different clothes ) and you can go out to stroll , jog or whatever. Why isn’t there such a thing? I feel I discussed in certainly one of my earlier posts that Coolibar had a reasonably good pant for ladies referred to as Solar Pant. I'm positive a lot of girls would want such varieties of clothes. I then put in an elastic band to supply more tension because the waist band could be a bit too massive in any other case, and the pant is practically a dream. I did have to change the waist myself by taking out the drawstring which involved cutting into the back of the waistband area because the drawstring was sewn into that space. It is vitally sensible for a variety of activities. It's not so long that the hem drags on the flooring. It's not for very extremely popular weather but that can depend by yourself skill to tolerate hot weather. It is of a cloth blend that isn't like cotton. All pants should have pockets, but sometimes the way the pockets are designed make them useless anyway. I discover it is a very particular person factor. This is how most hiking pants needs to be designed. It is a teensy bit too dense for very popular weather very much like the unique Coolibar Sun Pant. It is meant to be used with a belt however I discover that I don’t need one to put on this pant. I found a pant on Cabela’s that's for men, however which suits effectively and it is named “The utility Pant” (see one of the last two hyperlinks below). It stretches a bit so it does not get tight if you bend or transfer. In fact not everybody has the same determine as I achieve this others might need a distinct opinion. However normally this is an efficient type of pant . In the event you do like it you need to write to the corporate and tell them to cling on these pants. One flaw with this pant is that the entrance pockets are designed so because the openings are slits nearly completely parallel with the waist. I believe they're going to discontinue it so that you may want to give it a try. The fabric stretches so it's not as dangerous as if it had been with denims with these sorts of pockets. It's an impractical design and that i don’t know why clothing designers make pant pockets like this. With these kinds of pockets it's a must to maneuver your palms in a extra unnatural means and even lift the hem of your shirt to put your fingers in your entrance pants pockets. It has to be for style, nothing else. Pockets must be a line down the thigh, or a diagonal line is good too. It is a good suggestion to have zippered pockets. Anyone who has ever gotten his/her open pocket stuck on a door knob or the handlebar of a bike whereas passing by too shut will know what I mean. But generally zippers can cause scrapes to the again of the hand when you place your fingers in. There's a must design zippers of non-scraping material for this goal. There can be another men’s pant from Columbia. I believe I mentioned them before (see one of the two links under). Why aren’t any clothes designers working on this? They are of a great material for hot days, however for me, I found myself eradicating the belt and sewing an elastic band within the back of the waistband area so as to make the belt pointless. I experience a bike. I hardly ever use shorts even after i jog. However again, I should settle for no matter comes close to what I need. I came across a operating quick called Brooks Sherpa IV. I tend to only go to clothes stores to look at designs and supplies . What I did like about it was the lightweight material. I simply questioned why regular long pants should not product of such a cloth. It would be wonderful for a hiking pant meant for very popular weather. The material was very very similar to a very very lightweight softshell. There's one from the North Face referred to as The Prolix jacket. I like softshell clothing. It is vitally lightweight, not excellent for cold weather by itself however you may put layering underneath it. It is versatile and suits excellently and allows freedom of motion. But softshells are made for winter, spring and fall, not summer. Also , why aren’t there any really really practically-designed vests? The Brook’s Sherpa IV would make an incredible summertime softshell. There must be a vest for touring. I discover myself wishing for such a factor. It doesn't exist. Why not make one of lightweight and stretchy material? I know that I have mentioned to a lot on this post. I will stop for now. I hope I didn't bore anybody. I have numerous ideas for the better design of clothing and I'll most likely put up again with my ideas unless I'm informed to not. I may have been a bit political too.
